<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Moto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skydeck.com/blog/mobile-market/open-moto/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skydeck.com/blog/mobile-market/open-moto</link>
	<description>Your Cell Phone Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 02:47:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Motorola</title>
		<link>http://skydeck.com/blog/mobile-market/open-moto/comment-page-1#comment-1042</link>
		<dc:creator>Motorola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skydeck.com/blog/technology/open-moto/#comment-1042</guid>
		<description>Hi,&lt;br&gt;Well the upcoming new handsets of Motorola company are in users demand because company know that what is user need? what the user want? all the facilities are in Motorola mobile phone&#039;s handsets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />Well the upcoming new handsets of Motorola company are in users demand because company know that what is user need? what the user want? all the facilities are in Motorola mobile phone&#39;s handsets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skydeck : 5 predictions about Google phones</title>
		<link>http://skydeck.com/blog/mobile-market/open-moto/comment-page-1#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Skydeck : 5 predictions about Google phones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 02:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skydeck.com/blog/technology/open-moto/#comment-553</guid>
		<description>[...] Nokia may see Google as a strategic threat and Motorola has made a massive investment in their own Linux-based platform, but everybody else will be happy to rally behind Google. (Call it the OpenSocial strategy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nokia may see Google as a strategic threat and Motorola has made a massive investment in their own Linux-based platform, but everybody else will be happy to rally behind Google. (Call it the OpenSocial strategy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shirish Marathe</title>
		<link>http://skydeck.com/blog/mobile-market/open-moto/comment-page-1#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirish Marathe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 13:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skydeck.com/blog/technology/open-moto/#comment-552</guid>
		<description>hi,
How can i update my Motorola A780 software
and Is there any way to run a Windows Mobile OS on Motorola A780
please write in detail
thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi,<br />
How can i update my Motorola A780 software<br />
and Is there any way to run a Windows Mobile OS on Motorola A780<br />
please write in detail<br />
thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devittj</title>
		<link>http://skydeck.com/blog/mobile-market/open-moto/comment-page-1#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>devittj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2007 05:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skydeck.com/blog/technology/open-moto/#comment-551</guid>
		<description>mika,

Clearly Motorola hasn&#039;t moved fast enough to satisfy the developer community. See &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.osnews.com/story.php/15040/Editorial-The-Chaos-of-Incompatibility-in-Mobile-Linux/&quot;  rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this rant&lt;/a&gt; for example, or &lt;a href=&quot;http://openezx.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this project&lt;/a&gt; to reverse engineer the EZX platform.

We&#039;re a little more patient, and we also suspect that Motorola never released SDKs for EZX because they saw it as an interim solution while they developed LJ.

Thanks for the comment,
Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mika,</p>
<p>Clearly Motorola hasn&#8217;t moved fast enough to satisfy the developer community. See <a href="http://www.osnews.com/story.php/15040/Editorial-The-Chaos-of-Incompatibility-in-Mobile-Linux/"  rel="nofollow">this rant</a> for example, or <a href="http://openezx.org/" rel="nofollow">this project</a> to reverse engineer the EZX platform.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re a little more patient, and we also suspect that Motorola never released SDKs for EZX because they saw it as an interim solution while they developed LJ.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment,<br />
Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: li mika</title>
		<link>http://skydeck.com/blog/mobile-market/open-moto/comment-page-1#comment-550</link>
		<dc:creator>li mika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 23:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skydeck.com/blog/technology/open-moto/#comment-550</guid>
		<description>hi Jason,

Just wanna drop a quite comment about your excellent post.

I worked with Motorola China in my previous job. My previous company has the document viewer software pre-installed in all MotoJUIX devices aka Linux smartphones e.g. A1200, A768, A760, A780, etc... all these models are readily available in Asia and selling well.

However, the only way that motorola allows 3rd party developer like us to include our software in their Linux smartphone is not via an open SDK, the SDK was given to us, but that was only when we had signed a deal with Motorola. There is still no sign of when are they going to make this SDK public. But judging by their recent big endorsement on Linux, I bet it won&#039;t be too long before we get access to SDK tool to develop apps for MotoJUIX phones.

just my 2 cents,
mika</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Jason,</p>
<p>Just wanna drop a quite comment about your excellent post.</p>
<p>I worked with Motorola China in my previous job. My previous company has the document viewer software pre-installed in all MotoJUIX devices aka Linux smartphones e.g. A1200, A768, A760, A780, etc&#8230; all these models are readily available in Asia and selling well.</p>
<p>However, the only way that motorola allows 3rd party developer like us to include our software in their Linux smartphone is not via an open SDK, the SDK was given to us, but that was only when we had signed a deal with Motorola. There is still no sign of when are they going to make this SDK public. But judging by their recent big endorsement on Linux, I bet it won&#8217;t be too long before we get access to SDK tool to develop apps for MotoJUIX phones.</p>
<p>just my 2 cents,<br />
mika</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devittj</title>
		<link>http://skydeck.com/blog/mobile-market/open-moto/comment-page-1#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>devittj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 21:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skydeck.com/blog/technology/open-moto/#comment-549</guid>
		<description>Raddedas,

That&#039;s a great question. All I can say is that Motorola has been talking about releasing Linux SDKs for a long time. See this interview with Guy Martin for example: http://www.osnews.com/story.php/15659/Interview-Guy-Martin-of-Motorolas-Linux-Division/

It is true that for the next few years at least we will see a greater number of open phones (by my definition) in Europe than in the US, and more in the US than in Japan.

Thanks for the comment,
Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raddedas,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a great question. All I can say is that Motorola has been talking about releasing Linux SDKs for a long time. See this interview with Guy Martin for example: <a href="http://www.osnews.com/story.php/15659/Interview-Guy-Martin-of-Motorolas-Linux-Division/" rel="nofollow">http://www.osnews.com/story.php/15659/Interview-Guy-Martin-of-Motorolas-Linux-Division/</a></p>
<p>It is true that for the next few years at least we will see a greater number of open phones (by my definition) in Europe than in the US, and more in the US than in Japan.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment,<br />
Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raddedas</title>
		<link>http://skydeck.com/blog/mobile-market/open-moto/comment-page-1#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>raddedas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 06:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skydeck.com/blog/technology/open-moto/#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Hi Jason,

I like your definition: &quot;For the purposes of this article, if we can write an app that has access to all of the features on your phone and give it to you without your carrier’s permission, your phone is open&quot;

Can you give a reference to where Motorola said that their new platform (JUIX for want of a better name from them) is open by this definition?  You&#039;re certainly not the only person to assume this (eg. Hinkmond Wong), but I just can&#039;t find the evidence - though I haven&#039;t had time to watch the full webcast...

My assumption from what I&#039;ve seen written is that this new platform will be like the DoCoMo Linux and Symbian platforms, which are very much closed to everyone but the operator.  I&#039;d love to be proved wrong, of course...

Cheers,
Raddedas</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jason,</p>
<p>I like your definition: &#8220;For the purposes of this article, if we can write an app that has access to all of the features on your phone and give it to you without your carrier’s permission, your phone is open&#8221;</p>
<p>Can you give a reference to where Motorola said that their new platform (JUIX for want of a better name from them) is open by this definition?  You&#8217;re certainly not the only person to assume this (eg. Hinkmond Wong), but I just can&#8217;t find the evidence &#8211; though I haven&#8217;t had time to watch the full webcast&#8230;</p>
<p>My assumption from what I&#8217;ve seen written is that this new platform will be like the DoCoMo Linux and Symbian platforms, which are very much closed to everyone but the operator.  I&#8217;d love to be proved wrong, of course&#8230;</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Raddedas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
